Real Estate Investor_REVIEWS

REASONS REAL ESTATE INVESTORS SHOULD BE A REALTOR’S BEST FRIEND



The working relationship between agents and real estate investors has never reached its full potential. Often times, realtors fail to acknowledge the benefits of working with investors and investors avoid agents to bypass their commission fees.

Most realtors refrain from working with investors because they are focused on short term results. The value medium to high ticket transactions over the potentially lower ticket ones that investors are interested in.

These two types of real estate professionals tend to neglect how beneficial it can be to work with one another. For agents, servicing full time investors can be incredibly profitable in the long run. For investors, real estate agents present many value-added propositions to their ongoing business. Understanding how to find an investor friendly real estate agent can be a key piece of the puzzle.

Despite dealing with traditionally undesirable properties, investors are still valuable clients. If real estate agents remain open minded about working with them, they can capitalize on their long term worth.

REPEAT BUSINESS

All good agents strive to build relationships with clients to encourage repeat business. They use promotional materials to remain top of mind for previous clients, waiting for their next move. But, since the majority of homeowners only buy or sell once or twice in a lifetime, these marketing tactics may be hitting a dead end.

Traditional home sales undoubtedly generate larger commissions than investment property sales. However, these commissions tend to be earned less frequently. After a homeowner’s initial real estate transaction, their potential dollar value diminishes. Agent’s, typically, cannot count on recurring business from them.

Agents seeking repeat business from the same client should consider working with investors. Investors depend on a steady flow of deals to support themselves financially and need the help of a realtor more often than the traditional home buyer or seller.

In fact, successful investors often do one or two deals per month, ensuring regular business for the agent involved. Fix and flips are the perfect example where agents can partner up for a mutually beneficial transaction.

Agents who work with investors can expect a more consistent and predictable flow of business. The long term client value of an investor is extremely promising. Rather than working to establish relationships with large amounts of clients with infrequent upside, real estate agents can foster relationships with a handful of investors and count on them for frequent transactions.

LIGHTNING FAST DEALS

It’s easier for investors to commit to a fix and flip property that they may only own for six months than it is for a future homeowner to commit to a house that will be theirs for a lifetime.

Some agents get stuck working with a client for months or even years looking for the “perfect home”. Those who aren’t time pressed to buy or sell tend to nitpick specific details of homes; all the while taking up an agent’s time and resources.

Since investors rely on real estate to make a living, they are always serious buyers. Rather than casually shopping the market like many homeowners – they are ready to buy.

Investors don’t have time on their side. The success of their business depends on speed. Investors must move quickly to beat out competitors and capitalize on hot markets. They must also sell quickly to minimize holding costs.

Experienced investors flip multiple houses simultaneously and can turnaround a project in just 9 months (that’s the average for one of our borrowers); for them, the faster the better.

Agents who work with investors can reap the benefits of speedy transactions and earn quick commissions. With the right collection of investor clientele, they can expect to do 5 to 6 deals per month, earning separate commissions on each one!

DOUBLE COMMISSIONS

An investor occupies two different roles during an investment. In the first leg of a project, they are buyers searching the market for properties. In the latter half, they are sellers listing rehabbed properties on the market.

When an agent provides exceptional service to the investor on the buying end, they will often be trusted to handle the sale as well. This means that the agent is entitled to two separate commissions. They receive a buyer’s agent commission on the way in and a seller’s agent commission on the way out.

REFERRALS

Investors are typically plugged into the local real estate community. They often attend meetups, events, and conferences to network with other investors and real estate professionals. This networking provides a window of opportunity for agents to earn referral business.

Since investors are social people, they are sure to spread the word about a trustworthy and helpful agent. Sometimes, agents will receive indirect referral business from an existing client.

If an agent suggests a property that doesn’t meet their client’s needs, it still may work for another investor. Each investor has a different comfort zone and different margins to hit.

A property may be desirable for one investor and undesirable for another. Investors know this and will often recommend properties that they can’t use to other investors who can use them; all in hopes that they return the favor in the future.

When an investor passes on a property and suggests it to someone else, the agent in charge earns a new client in the process. This process is repeatable at scale, so long as the agent continues to find quality investment properties that can be circulated throughout the investment community.

Just like real estate agents having a relationship with a mortgage broker, it can work the same with an investor. It’s all about building confidence in one another.

SMOOTHER TRANSACTIONS

Traditional home buyers make purchasing decisions based on emotions and aesthetics. They want a home that looks and feels right. These qualifications are subjective and tough for an agent to grasp, making it difficult to suggest the right properties.

Investors base decisions on numbers. Their criteria in searching for an investment property is specific and well defined. If they can’t find properties at a steep discount with value-added potential, they move on.

Working with a client whose criteria is predictable makes it easier for the agent. When they understand an investor’s target numbers, realtors can more efficiently suggest listings for that client. There is less back and forth passing on properties as both parties are on the same page.

Also, since investors understand real estate, they more adeptly handle all of the minutiae involved in the transaction. Investors understand the documentation and what’s expected of them, which means they typically move quicker and don’t need as much help throughout the process.

This is all to say that working with an investor can make an agent’s job much easier. He or she can spend less time explaining paperwork and showing the wrong properties, and spend more time productively building their business.

Investors have high demands and need agents willing to keep up with their fast paced business. If an agent is up to the task, he or she stands to open up new business channels that will continue to develop and flourish into larger opportunities in the future.

ADDITIONAL REAL ESTATE RESOURCES WORTH READING

Use these additional resources to make smart decisions when buying or selling a home.

Bio: Eric Krattenstein is the Chief Marketing Officer and Head Of Sales for Asset Based Lending, a private commercial lending firm that finances fix and flip investments for thousands of real estate investors each year. Prior to joining Asset Based Lending, Eric led a boutique marketing agency.

Sharing is caring!
  • 311
    Shares
  • 144
  • 100
  • 67


SHARE ON:
Sharing is caring!
  • 311
    Shares
  • 144
  • 100
  • 67

Search

Sign In

WE VALUE YOUR BUSINESS

The meeting whisperer: Executives pay me to fix their company meetings

Leaders turn to me when their group or team appears stuck and when their meetings are either unproductive, counterproductive or worse, rampant with conflict and desperately in need of something to break the logjam or create a breakthrough.
By Dr. Mark GoulstonContributing Writer,
Dec 28, 2016, 7:20am ESTUpdated Dec 28, 2016, 10:32am EST

I can’t believe I’m about to share with you the simplest way I make money from helping any board, executive, management, team or other meeting.

My hope is that it will make you chuckle and see how it could work, more than it will make you snicker.

Before we start…

Are you someone who doesn’t like getting your picture taken at the Department of Motor Vehicles? Are you someone who doesn’t like the sound of your voice? Are you someone who becomes self-conscious whenever someone is recording or videoing you?

If you answered, “Yes,” to any or all of the above, there is a good chance that being self-conscious causes you to become slightly more self-aware and especially self-aware when you might be behaving in a way that might be embarrassing or cause people to judge you.

Listening from outside the paradigm

So here’s the deal. Or should I say… my deal.

CEO’s, founders, board chairmen and entrepreneurs work with me one on one to have conversations that result in their seeing or realizing things they never would have discovered had we not met and that are relevant and helpful to their success. I think I help them look inside their paradigm by my listening to them from outside their paradigm.

When I have asked them why our conversations are different and helpful, they tell me, “You listen to me and ask penetrating questions without any agenda and you are entirely non-judgmental. That causes me to lower my guard and say and think things I wouldn’t say and think elsewhere. All my other conversations are agenda-driven, and everyone has an agenda.”

Fixing a meeting

My purpose in telling you the above is not to puff myself up or brag, but to set the stage for why, when and how, founders, board chairmen, entrepreneurs or senior managers ask me to attend meetings with their key people.

The leader of the group or team meeting has personally experienced making breakthroughs by virtue of conversations they have had with me. They turn to me when their group or team appears stuck and where their meetings are either unproductive, counterproductive or worse, rampant with conflict and desperately in need of something to break the logjam or create a breakthrough.

This leader sends out an email prior to the meeting that I will be attending the meeting as an observer to help it become more effective, efficient and productive. I am also told who will be attending the meeting ahead of time.

Prior to the start of the meeting, I introduce myself to each attendee by telling them my name, asking them theirs, reaching out and shaking their hand and looking deeply into their eyes in a way that makes a connection. That eye contact is something I have learned to do from nearly 40 years of being an interventional crisis psychiatrist and FBI/police hostage negotiation trainer (see video clip), and results in people feeling connected to me.

At the start of the meeting, the leader reiterates what he/she sent out in the prior email announcing that I would be attending, introduces me, and asks if I want to say anything.

Zen, not comatose

I then respond as follows: “Hello everyone, I’m here to help this meeting be more efficient, effective, productive, participatory, on track, to complete the agenda and ensure every attendee knows what specific actions they will be accountable for after the meeting.

"To accomplish that, after what I am saying to you now, I will sit on the periphery, close my eyes and be expressionless — more zen like than comatose — for the entire meeting. What I will be doing is listening for flow, cooperation and collaboration and anything that gets in the way of those, including: people talking too much, talking too little, going off on a tangent and off track, interrupting others and anything else that prevents it from being a productive meeting.

“Also, I will not be reporting anything that I hear to anyone. In my experience of doing this, it appears to help meetings and participants be more clear, productive, respectful, cooperative and collaborative, because it causes everyone to be more aware of everything that makes the meeting productive and unproductive, a good use of time or a waste of time. More often than not, that group consciousness and group awareness spontaneously causes the meeting to self-correct. Companies bring me specifically in, because they tell me that that nobody in the company can play my role and also, I am considered a widely regarded expert in the area of listening. So unless, (leader’s name) has anything else to say, I will close my eyes and begin listening.”

Because this process smokes out into the open, the most distracting, derailing and counterproductive members of the group, the CEO often retains me for $5-10k/month (depending on how much I am used) and offers (anonymously) coaching by me to the members of the team. I don't tell the CEO who meets me — I just give an accounting of the hours used.

These team meetings often cause great discomfort in those who are the most disruptive and destructive to the proceedings and not infrequently causes them to seek me out, because they know that I am on to them and also causes them to realize that the other team members are on to them as well.

It's amazing how the power of my calmly listening with my eyes closed and being still can cause people who have something to hide to seek my help.

2 OF 3 ARTICLES REMAINING

Connecting: How should you handle a romance at work?

McDonald's to use Amazon's Alexa to help find employees

Five things you need to know today, and presidential paychecks

(SLIDESHOW) Here are the highest paid city of Winston-Salem employees

Some local CEOs make much more than their employees — here's how much

EMPLOYER SHOWCASE 7
SPONSORED

SCPS Employees Active in Wellness Year Round

Q&A: CAB Inc.’s Terri Jondahl, 2019 Women Who Mean Business honoree

Before email, home delivery was a big deal

The $200K club: Will Bay Area tech salaries continue to rise?

HOME OF THE DAY 20
SPONSORED

Casual Elegance In This One Story Walkout Home

HOME OF THE DAY 15
SPONSORED

A Wine Connoisseur's Waikiki Retreat

HOME OF THE DAY 13
SPONSORED

Townhomes in Alpharetta’s Premier Walkable District

Back to Top
  1. Small Business»
  2. Managing Employees»
  3. Teamwork»

The Disadvantages of Teamwork in the Workplace

by Kimberlee Leonard; Reviewed by Jayne Thompson, LLB, LLM; Updated January 25, 2019

Many of today's businesses are moving toward team models, in which creative workspaces have replaced cubicles, and in which people are encouraged to brainstorm new ideas. For all the positives that business owners are finding with the team model, there are some disadvantages to consider. Understanding what is working for your company is important so that you can maximize employee satisfaction and productivity.

Teams Don't Always Get On

Every basketball team needs five players on the court during a game. What happens if two of those key players don't want to share the spotlight? The team won't function to its highest capacity. There are some people who aren't designed to be team players, and there are some teams whose team members just don't get along.

Either of these cases make for a problematic scenario in the workplace team concept. If people are selfish and are trying to shine on their own, that person is not communicating with the other people on the team, and so the team members are not getting the information and resources necessary to do their jobs well.

For example, assume that a team is re-organizing the warehouse and is also implementing a new inventory system. Everyone is supposed to arrive at 10 a.m. on Saturday to start the process, when the third-party vendor asks to move the start time to 8 a.m., because of conflict. If Joe tells everyone but Jane, then Jane will arrive late, will look unprofessional, and she will be well behind everyone else, potentially putting the project behind schedule.

Clashes and Conflicts

Ideally, if you do your job as a leader, you develop a team that has strong communication skills and trust in your fellow team members to get things done properly. That is an ideal scenario because every relationship has the potential for conflict. When conflict arises, it can reduce the productivity of the team. People are more focused on who is right or wrong and which side to take rather than getting the job done. It adds stress and anxiety to the entire team, all of which can then cause morale and productivity to spiral downwards.

Time-Consuming Considerations

Creating a team scenario in the office can lead to time-consuming meetings, in which team members disagree about a course of action. Unless there is a specific person leading the discussion with the ability to make the final decision, the team could deliberate on issues for extended periods of time, getting stuck in making a decision rather than getting out there to make a contribution. Business leaders can avoid this by making sure that team members know their roles and that they understand the vision, and who, ultimately, is in charge of decisions.

The Lazy Team Member

There is the possibility that one team member might want to live off the success of the entire team. Employee reviews might not be all that effective in team scenarios, because during an employee review, it can be difficult to specify contributing team members. If a person feels he can get away with the least amount of contribution, he could freeload off of the team.

Business leaders can mitigate this by having regular peer evaluations from the team that is done in confidence so that no one fears suffering any ramifications for telling on a co-worker. Left unchecked, the lazy team member might create resentment among the rest of the team, which, in turn, hurts productivity through negative morale.

Resistance to Leadership Directives

When everyone is part of the team and is making decisions, the vision and authority of the actual leader can become blurred by the power of the team. If the team members feel that they have a strong say in major decisions, then they can resist higher level directives, because they feel the team's solution is better.

This can drive a company away from the main mission, in which they have convoluted what everyone is trying to accomplish.

Leaders should consult teams while making it very clear that they have the ultimate decision and the team is there to support the mission, as led by management.

You May Like
Published on Dec 16, 2014

Advantages and disadvantages of Teamwork

  1. 1. TEAMWORK By: Shanniel Morgan

  2. 2. Definition of Teamwork This can be described as a technique used in organizations and groups to accomplish certain task.

  3. 3. Advantages of Teamwork Creative problem-solving from the inputs of individuals of the team. The pooling of resources, ideas and expertise. Greater control over the tasks

  4. assigned. Providing for continuity in the carrying out of tasks or projects. If a member leaves the team, the project continues.

  5. 4. Disadvantages of Teamwork It can take a lot of time to make decisions and complete tasks- this can happen due to different ideas or unsettled disagreement. Unwillingness to

  6. participate- a member of a team might have been given a part of the task to complete and did not complete it in the required time. Unequal Participation- With some teams, there can be a tendency for members to sit back and let others do most of the work. Not Team Players- some workers may not function well being a part of a team, preferring to work on their own.

  7. 5. Reference Textbook- Principles of Business for CSEC –Robinson, K & Hamil, S (2011), Essential Principles of Business for CSEC - Dr. Alan Whitcomb (2011)

  8. 6. Reference Textbook- Principles of Business for CSEC –Robinson, K & Hamil, S (2011), Essential Principles of Business for CSEC - Dr. Alan Whitcomb (2011)

Recommended